gno.law

People v. Crews

California Court of Appeal · Crim. No. 2771 · 1958-09-16 · Published · 163 Cal. App. 2d 553 · 329 P.2d 550 · 1958 Cal. App. LEXIS 1537

THE PEOPLE v. WINSTON GLENN CREWS

Area
criminal
Panel
Paul Peek (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Peek

PEEK, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction following a jury verdict finding him guilty of forgery (Pen. Code, § 470) and issuing a check without sufficient funds. (Pen. Code, § 476a.)

The record shows that defendant’s notice of appeal was filed on the eleventh day following the entry of judgment. The mere fact that the notice was prepared for defendant and filed by the prison records officer is insufficient to warrant application of the rule enunciated in People v. Slobodion, 30 Cal.2d 362 [181 P.2d 868], (See also People v. Head, 46 Cal.2d 886 [299 P.2d 872].) It necessarily follows that the appeal must be dismissed. (People v. Riser, 47 Cal.2d 594 [305 P.2d 18].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Van Dyke, P. J., and Schottky, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus