gno.law

Joseph W. Wolfskill Co. v. Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District

California Court of Appeal · [Civ. No. 5506 · 1957-01-21 · Published · 147 Cal. App. 2d 826 · 306 P.2d 25 · 1957 Cal. App. LEXIS 2323

JOSEPH W. WOLFSKILL COMPANY (a Corporation) v. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT

Area
civil
Panel
Martin J. Coughlin (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Coughlin

COUGHLIN, J. pro tem.* This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for change of venue in an action brought to enjoin the defendants from causing water to flow over its land, and from proceeding with an action in eminent domain to obtain land for the construction of ditches to be used for such purpose.

The grounds for the motion and the contentions upon which appellant relies for reversal are the same as those urged in an action between the same parties this day decided by this court, i. e., Riverside Flood Control & Water Conservation Dist. v. Joseph W. Wolfshill Co., a Corporation, 4th Civil No. 5507, mte, p. 714 [306 P.2d 22], For the reasons therein stated, the order is affirmed.

Barnard, P. J., and Mussell, J., concurred.

Assigned by Chairman of Judicial Council.

Cites, in this corpus