gno.law

Hutchinson v. Dow

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 17057 · 1956-04-02 · Published · 140 Cal. App. 2d 957 · 297 P.2d 38 · 1956 Cal. App. LEXIS 2349

Estate of EDGAR LAURENCE DOW, MAXINE PATRICIA HUTCHINSON v. MAXINE B. DOW, Individually and as Administratrix With the Will Annexed, etc.

Area
civil
Panel
Wood, Fred

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Woodfred

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

The appeal herein is from an order of September 7, 1955, which is described in our opinion this day filed in Dow v. Superior Court, No. 1 Civil 16939, ante, p. 399 [297 P.2d 30].

Respondent herein has moved to dismiss the appeal upon the asserted ground that the order in question is nonappealable. We hold that those provisions of the order which direct the payment of money or the distribution of property are appealable for the reasons stated in our opinion in No. 16939.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.

Peters, P. J., and Bray, J., concurred.

Respondent’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied May 29, 1956.

Cites, in this corpus