People v. Wexner
THE PEOPLE v. MEYER LOUIS WEXNER
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Louis C. Drapeau (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Drapeau
DRAPEAU, J.
Defendant was convicted of grand theft. He admitted two prior felony convictions, for which he was imprisoned in other states.
The public defender represented defendant on his trial by the judge of the superior court. On his appeal, defendant has prepared his own briefs. He contends that the amended information does not state a criminal offense, and that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction.
This court has carefully gone over the record. There is no merit in either contention.
The judgment is affirmed.
White, P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.