Cramer v. Cerciat French Laundry & Dry Cleaners

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 15639 · 1954-03-10 · Published · 123 Cal. App. 2d 764 · 267 P.2d 391 · 1954 Cal. App. LEXIS 1253

THEODORE CRAMER v. CERCIAT FRENCH LAUNDRY AND DRY CLEANERS

Area: civil
Panel: John T. Nourse (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Nourse

NOURSE, P. J.

Both parties have briefed this appeal on the assumption it was taken from the judgment. However, reference to the transcript discloses that the appeal is limited to the order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

As it is settled beyond question (Code Civ. Proc., § 963, subd. 2) that an appeal does not lie from an order denying a new trial, this appeal must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Dooling, J., and Kaufman, J., concurred.