In re Sweeden
In re JIMMIE SWEEDEN, JR., on Habeas Corpus
- Area
- other
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus, alleging generally the same facts related in People v. Jimmie Sweeden, Jr., Crim No. 937, ante, p. 891 [254 P.2d 899], this day decided. He here cites the same authorities and advances the same reasons there advanced as grounds for his release under this writ. He expresses the claim that the trial court acted arbitrarily in revoking his probation order.
The contentions here made are sufficiently discussed and fully answered in that case. In addition, In re Davis, 37 Cal.2d 872 [236 P.2d 579], holds that the validity of such an order, when reviewed by habeas corpus, should first be sought from the revoking court.
*914I
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Sweeden Crim. 937 · 1953-03-24
- In Re Davis Crim. 5222 · 1951-10-26
Cited by
- People v. Renier Crim. 2719 · 1957-02-14
- People v. Wertz Crim. 2687 · 1956-10-24