Kesson v. Cly

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 19344 · 1953-02-25 · Published · 116 Cal. App. 2d 264 · 253 P.2d 486 · 1953 Cal. App. LEXIS 1065

SARAH JANE KESSON v. MONTE CLY

Area: civil
Panel: William C. Doran (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Doran

DORAN, J.

This is an appeal by defendant from the judgment.

Plaintiff sold defendant certain property under the terms *265of a conditional sales contract. The property was a “duplex” and the selling price was $6,500. Defendant took possession and collected the rents. The contract was dated February 28, 1949.

The complaint, in several causes of action, seeks a rescission, quiet title, and damages for fraud. A notice of rescission was served on defendant on June 30, 1950, following defendant’s failure to make the payments according to the terms of the contract, and the within action followed.

It is defendant’s contention that “(1) the pleadings and judgment are lacking in any of the essential elements of any cause of action; (2) the Judgment cannot be sustained on any theory of Unlawful Detainer, Fraud, or Trusteeship; (3) the Judgment should be reversed and remanded for a new trial.”

It is unnecessary to go into further detail. The appeal is on the judgment roll and the record supports plaintiff’s position in every respect.

The appeal is without merit.

Affirmed.

White, P. J., and Dr apean, J., concurred.

Appellants’ petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied April 23, 1953.