gno.law

Providence Baptist Church v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 15702 · 1953-02-10 · Published · 115 Cal. App. 2d 853 · 252 P.2d 973 · 1953 Cal. App. LEXIS 1753

PROVIDENCE BAPTIST CHURCH OF SAN FRANCISCO v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Area
civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

By this petition for a writ of review petitioner seeks to review and annul an interlocutory judgment entered on July 10, 1951. The Supreme Court has determined that the superior court had jurisdiction to enter that order. (Providence Baptist Church v. Superior Court, 40 Cal.2d 55 [251 P.2d 10].) That being so, the writ of review will not lie. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1068.) Moreover, the interlocutory judgment can be reviewed on the appeal from the final judgment. That too precludes the issuance of the writ. (4 Cal.Jur. at p. 1053.) The petition for a writ of review is denied.

Cites, in this corpus