Rosenberg v. Feigin

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 18580 · 1952-03-26 · Published · 110 Cal. App. 2d 56 · 241 P.2d 1043 · 1952 Cal. App. LEXIS 1481

HERBERT ROSENBERG v. EMANUEL V. FEIGIN

Area: civil
Panel: Lloyd T. Hanson (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Hanson

HANSON, J. pro tem.

The appeal is from an order denying a motion to set aside a ruling which sustained a to the third amended complaint. The order is not an appealable order (Code Civ. Proc., § 963; Title Ins. & Trust Co. v. California Dev. Co., 159 Cal. 484 [114 P. 838]).

The appeal is dismissed.

White, P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus

Title Ins. Trust Co. v. Calif. Etc. Co. L.A. Nos. 2791-2792. · 1911-03-13

Cited by

Rosenberg v. Feigin Civ. 19587 · 1953-08-19