gno.law

Svistunoff v. Svistunoff

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 14830 · 1952-01-15 · Published · 108 Cal. App. 2d 646 · 239 P.2d 655 · 1952 Cal. App. LEXIS 1721

PETER M. SVISTUNOFF v. MICHAEL SVISTUNOFF

Area
civil
Panel
Absalom F. Bray (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Bray

BRAY, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from an order dated September 7, 1950, setting aside a default and judgment. As pointed out in our opinion this day filed in Svistunoff v. Svistunoff, No. 14831, ante, p. 638 [239 P.2d 650], this order is void on the face of the record and was properly vacated by the order of October 6th. Therefore, the appeal is moot, and is hereby dismissed.

Peters, P. J., and Wood (Fred B.), J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing was denied February 14, 1952, and appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied March 13, 1952.

Cites, in this corpus