White v. Packard-Bell Co.

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 18413 · 1951-10-15 · Published · 106 Cal. App. 2d 830 · 236 P.2d 205 · 1951 Cal. App. LEXIS 1841

BRUCE WHITE v. PACKARD-BELL COMPANY (a Corporation)

Area: civil
Panel: Marshall F. McComb (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — McComb

McCOMB, J.

It has been stipulated that the decision in Marshall v. Packard-Bell, No. 18411 (ante, p. 770 [236 P.2d 201]), shall be controlling in the above-entitled case. Since we have this day filed a decision affirming the judgment in Marshall v. Packard-Bell, it is ordered that the judgment in the instant case be affirmed.

Moore, P. J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing was denied November 1,1951, and appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied December 13, 1951.

Cites, in this corpus

Marshall v. Packard-Bell Co. Civ. 18411 · 1951-10-15