gno.law

Offer v. McMillan

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 7920 · 1951-01-23 · Published · 101 Cal. App. 2d 840 · 226 P.2d 380 · 1951 Cal. App. LEXIS 1102

KARL OFFER v. MABEL V. McMILLAN

Proceeding
appeal
Outcome
affirmed — The judgment is affirmed.
Area
civil
Panel
Deirup (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Deirup

DEIRUP, J. pro tem.

The plaintiffs have appealed *841error. There is no basis for a discussion of this point, for we cannot take the opinion into account. “The findings and conclusions constitute the final decision of the court and an oral or written opinion cannot be resorted to for the purpose of impeaching or gainsaying the findings and judgment.” (Buckhantz v. R. G. Hamilton & Co., 71 Cal.App.2d 777, 781 [163 P.2d 756].)

The judgment is affirmed. Appeal from order denying new trial dismissed.

Adams, P. J., and Peek, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by