In re Smulevitz
In re JAMES SMULEVITZ, for Change of Name
- Area
- other
- Panel
- Vallee (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Vallée
VALLÉE, J.
Appeal by petitioners from a minute order denying their petition for change of name.
The ground on which the petition was denied was that petitioners had not resided within the state for at least one year prior to the filing of the petition. In Turesky v. Superior Court, 97 Cal.App.2d 838 [218 P.2d 784], it was held that the refusal to grant a change of name on that ground is arbitrary, without warrant of law, and an abuse of discretion.
On the authority of the Turesky case, the order denying the petition is reversed.
Shinn, P. J., and Wood (Parker), J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Turesky v. Superior Court Civ. 17770 · 1950-05-31
Cited by
- In Re Smulevitz Civ. No. 17687 · 1950-12-08