gno.law

Cameron v. Cameron

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 16756 · 1949-02-01 · Published · 89 Cal. App. 2d 825 · 202 P.2d 91 · 1949 Cal. App. LEXIS 1159

WINIFRED W. CAMERON v. ADRIAN E. CAMERON

Area
civil
Panel
Emmet H. Wilson (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Wilson

WILSON, J.

Plaintiff recovered a money judgment in the superior court against defendant. Pursuant to section 2422 of ■ the- Civil Code, a charging order was issued charging defendant’s interest in a partnership with payment of the judgment.

Plaintiff made a motion for an order for the foreclosure and sale of defendant’s interest in the partnership under the charging order. The motion was denied and plaintiff has appealed from the order. After the appeal was taken the judgment on which the charging order was based was reversed by *826this court. (Cameron v. Cameron, 88 Cal.App.2d 585 [199 P.2d 443].) Since the reversal of the judgment removes the basis for the charging order the appeal from the order denying foreclosure thereof is now moot.

Appeal dismissed.

Moore, P. J., and McComb, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus