gno.law

Travis v. Travis

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 16433 · 1948-12-22 · Published · 89 Cal. App. 2d 291 · 200 P.2d 843

MARJORIE T. TRAVIS v. MURRELL O. TRAVIS

Area
civil
Panel
Vallee (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Vallée

VALLÉE, J.

Defendant appealed from a minute order adjudging him in contempt for failure to comply with an interlocutory decree of divorce entered November 15,1945, ordering him to pay money to plaintiff for the support of herself and three minor children and attorney’s fees and costs. Plaintiff moves to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that an appeal does not lie from an order adjudging a party in contempt.

The law is settled that an appeal does not lie from a judgment or order made in a contempt proceeding. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1222; Taylor v. Superior Court, 20 Cal.2d 244, 246 [125 P.2d 1], and cases there cited; Phillips v. Superior Court, 22 Cal.2d 256, 257 [138 P.2d 838]; Weber v. Superior Court, 26 Cal.2d 144, 148 [156 P.2d 923]; Heck v. Heck, 63 Cal.App.2d 477, 478 [147 P.2d 114].)

Appeal dismissed.

Shinn, P. J., and Wood, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by