gno.law

Carpenter v. Fitch

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 16166 · 1948-09-13 · Published · 87 Cal. App. 2d 534 · 197 P.2d 174 · 1948 Cal. App. LEXIS 1357

W. L. CARPENTER v. FLOYD FITCH

Area
civil
Panel
Wood (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Wood

WOOD, J.

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from the order sustaining a demurrer to the second amended complaint without leave to amend.

No judgment was made or entered in the above entitled action, and of course there was no judgment from which an appeal could be taken. The trial court made an order sustaining defendants’ demurrer to the second amended complaint without leave to amend. Such an order is not appealable. (Code Civ. Proc., § 963; Braren v. Reliable Carpet Wks., Inc., 125 Cal.App. 489, 491 [13 P.2d 972]; Ross v. O’Brien, 1 Cal. App.2d 496, 498 [36 P.2d 1108]; Pulvermacher v. Los Angeles Co-Ordinating Com., 61 Cal.App.2d 704, 711 [143 P.2d 974].) The method of reviewing such a ruling on demurrer is by way of appeal from the judgment thereafter entered in the action. (Braren v. Reliable Carpet Wks., Inc., supra, p. 491.)

The appeal is dismissed.

Shinn, P. J., and Vallée, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus