Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY (a Corporation) v. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION and ARTHUR J. ROTHSCHILD
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Minor Moore (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Moore
MOORE, P. J.
The facts in this case are identical with those in Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., et al, No. 16396, ante, p. 726 [195 P.2d 919], with the exception that a wall partition fell upon the applicant Rothschild at the time of the explosion, causing his injuries. Basing the decision herein upon the opinion derived in that case the award is affirmed.
McComb, J., and Wilson, J., concurred.
A petition for a rehearing was denied July 30, 1948.
Petitioner’s application for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied September 8, 1948. Sehauer, J., and Spence, J., voted for a hearing.
Cites, in this corpus
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission Civ. 16396 · 1948-07-13