Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY (a Corporation) v. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION and CELIA ANGULO
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Minor Moore (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Moore
MOORE, P. J.
Celia Angulo was an employee of Rothschild-Kaufman Company on February 20, 1947, and was injured in the course of her employment. The facts are identical with those set forth in Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., et ad., No. 16396, ante, p. 726 [195 P.2d 919], this day filed. The same authorities apply and the same conclusion has been reached. Basing the decision upon the opinion filed in that action the award is affirmed.
MeComb, J., and Wilson, J., concurred.
A petition for a rehearing was denied July 30, 1948.
Petitioner’s application for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied September 8,1948. Schauer, J., and Spence, J., voted for a hearing.
Cites, in this corpus
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission Civ. 16396 · 1948-07-13