gno.law

Parker v. Owen

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 16191 · 1948-02-05 · Published · 83 Cal. App. 2d 474 · 189 P.2d 81 · 1948 Cal. App. LEXIS 1108

GLADYS L. PARKER v. MARGARET M. OWEN

Area
civil
Panel
Marshall F. McComb (author), Emmet H. Wilson

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — McComb

McCOMB, J.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the trial court denying plaintiff's motion to dismiss the action before any evidence was offered.

This is the single question presented for determination :

Is an order denying a motion to dismiss an action before any evidence is offered an appealable order?

This question must be answered in the negative for the reason that an order denying a motion to dismiss an action before any evidence is received is not an appealable order. (Perry v. Magneson, 207 Cal. 617, 620 [279 P. 650] ; Andersen v. Superior Court, 187 Cal. 95, 97. [200 P. 963]; Garthwaite v. Bank of Tulare, 134 Cal. 237, 243 [66 P. 326] ; Halsey v. Sears, 90 Cal.App. 306 et seq. [265 P. 858]; Forrester v. Lawler, 14 Cal.App. 170, 171 [111 P. 284].)

In view of the foregoing rule the appeal must be dismissed. It is so ordered.

Moore, P. J., concurred.

Concurrence — Wilson

WILSON, J.

I concur. It should be said, however, that the motion to dismiss ought to have been granted since the answer does not state an affirmative defense.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by