Roche v. McColgan
THEO. J. ROCHE v. CHARLES J. McCOLGAN, as State Franchise Tax Commissioner
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
It appears from the stipulation of the parties that the same legal questions are presented in this proceeding as those in Cullinan v. McColgan, 3 Civ. No. 7341, ante, page 976 [183 P.2d 115], this day filed.
For the reasons stated in our opinion in that case the judgment herein is affirmed.
Appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied September 22, 1947. Shenk, J., and Traynor, J., voted for a hearing.
Cited by
- Adoption of Parker S. F. 17453 · 1948-04-01
- Roche v. McColgan Civ. No. 7342 · 1947-07-25