Rostain v. Katz

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 3112 · 1944-02-29 · Published · 63 Cal. App. 2d 839 · 146 P.2d 248 · 1944 Cal. App. LEXIS 1010

PETER R. ROSTAIN v. PHIL C. KATZ, as Administrator with the Will Annexed, etc., Defendants ALEXANDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (a Corporation)

Area: civil
Panel: Charles R. Barnard (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Barnard

BARNARD, P. J.

This is an action to quiet title. The material facts are precisely similar to those in the case of Rostain v. Guggenheim, this day decided, ante, p. 127 [146 P.2d 247] and the issues and questions raised are exactly the same. For the reasons stated in the decision in that case the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Marks, J., and Griffin, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus

Rostain v. Guggenheim Civ. No. 3111 · 1944-02-29