Colden v. Costello

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 14020 · 1943-03-24 · Published · 57 Cal. App. 2d 1019 · 135 P.2d 208 · 1943 Cal. App. LEXIS 471

Estate of CHARLES J. COLDEN, CLARA N. COLDEN v. JOHN M. COSTELLO

Area: civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

December 3, 1942, the transcript on appeal was filed. Thereafter, the time for filing of briefs having elapsed, an order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution was issued, returnable March 24, 1943. On the latter date there was no appearance on behalf of appellant, either by brief or oral argument;

Therefore, pursuant to the provisions of see. 3, rule Y, Rules of the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal, it is ordered that the appeal from that portion of the order of the superior court from which this appeal is taken be, and the same hereby is, dismissed.