gno.law

Scheibe v. Scheibe

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 12189 · 1943-02-26 · Published · 57 Cal. App. 2d 1019 · 134 P.2d 841 · 1943 Cal. App. LEXIS 470

HARRY SCHEIBE v. MARTHA SCHEIBE

Area
civil
Panel
Benjamin K. Knight (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Knight

KNIGHT, J.

Plaintiff appealed from judgments entered in two actions brought- by him against his wife. One was for divorce, and the other (the present one) for the partition of a sum of money on deposit in a joint tenancy account carried by them with San Jose Building-Loan Association, in which the latter was joined as a party defendant. Both appeals were presented on a record consisting of two clerk’s transcripts, one reporter’s transcript and one set of briefs. The judgment in the divorce action has this day been affirmed (appeal No. 12188, ante, p. 336 [134 P.2d 835]), and all questions involved in the present appeal are therein discussed and decided. Por the reasons set forth therein, the judgment in the present case is likewise affirmed.

Peters, P. J., and Ward, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus