gno.law

In re Case

California Court of Appeal · Crim. No. 3632 · 1942-08-13 · Published · 54 Cal. App. 2d 36

In re LOUIS H. J. CASE, a Minor, on Habeas Corpus

Area
other

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

This matter came on for hearing upon the writ of habeas corpus issued on the 6th of August, 1942.

Prom the findings and decision on file it appears that the subject has been for some years the ward of Clara Rungie, *37and that on the 28th day of July, 1942, her letters of guardianship were revoked and it was ordered that the custody of the child be restored to his father, Howard L. Case. Inasmuch as such order was self-executing, the father acted in the proper exercise of his duties as the natural guardian in assuming custody of the child. (Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. Belcher, 4 Cal. (2d) 268,273 [48 P. (2d) 681].)

The writ is therefore discharged.

Cites, in this corpus