Vallera v. Vallera
MARIAN VALLERA v. CONCEZIO VALLERA
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
It appearing from the certificate of the clerk of the superior court that on February 5, 1942, an order was made by the superior court terminating proceedings on the appeal of the plaintiff, and It further appearing that plaintiff has not furnished this court with a sufficient record on appeal, It is ordered that the motion of defendant to dismiss the appeal of plaintiff be, and it is hereby granted.
It follows as a matter of course that the motion of plaintiff to be allowed to use portions of the record filed by defendant on his appeal must be, and it is, hereby denied.
Appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied June 22, 1942.
Cited by
- Vallera v. Vallera Civ. 14393 · 1944-05-05