gno.law

In re Smith

California Court of Appeal · Crim. No. 1762 · 1941-04-28 · Published · 44 Cal. App. 2d 932 · 112 P.2d 774 · 1941 Cal. App. LEXIS 1093

In re JESSIE SMITH, on Habeas Corpus

Area
other

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

Under the authority of the opinion filed this day, In the Matter of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus on Behalf of Boyd Coon, Steve Daduk, Howard Edmonds, Goodman Brudney, Earl Kinna, Clarence Vicklund, Alan Fite, Ramon Durem, Herbert Naboisek, Frances Schultz, Estelle Fels, Harriet Hoffman, Estelle Cochran, Ida Pollack and Merle Reese, Criminal No. 1761 [ante, p. 531 (112 Pac. (2d) 767)], the petition is denied, the proceeding is dismissed, and petitioner remanded to the custody of the sheriff.

Cites, in this corpus