Pinegar v. First National Bank
GEORGIA K. PINEGAR, and v. THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CLOVIS, and and C. K. WAKEFIELD, as Administrator, etc., Intervener and
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Charles R. Barnard (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Barnard
BARNARD, P. J.
This is a motion to dismiss this appeal from the judgment. Nothing has been filed in this court except the papers on this motion.
From the certificate of the county clerk it appears that the judgment was entered on June 28, 1940; that notice of appeal and notice to prepare transcript were filed on August 28, 1940, and that on October 26, 1940, an order was entered in the trial court terminating proceedings for the preparation of a transcript, which order recites that no undertaking was filed and no personal arrangements were made for the compensation of the stenographic reporter; that no extension of time had been granted; and that no bill of exceptions had ever been presented or filed.
The showing being sufficient (Foster v. Carey, 33 Cal. App. (2d) 543 [92 Pac. (2d) 444]), the motion must be granted. The appeal is dismissed.
Marks, J., and Griffin, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Foster v. Carey Civ. No. 2347 · 1939-06-27