Childress v. Peterson
Mrs. BEULA CHILDRESS v. JOHN T. PETERSON, as Chief of Police, etc.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Marks (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Marks
MARKS, Acting P. J.
This is a motion to dismiss this appeal because appellants' opening brief was not filed within the time provided by section 4 of rule I of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal.
Our record shows that the cleik’s and reporter's transcripts were filed on June 22, 1940. On August 19, 1940, respondents filed their notice of motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellants ’ opening brief was filed on the same day. This has been held a sufficient answer to the motion to dismiss. (Toth v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 113 Cal. App. 55 [297 Pac. 564] ; North v. Evans, 114 Cal. App. 714 [300 Pac. 893] ; Lisle v. Ragle, 10 Cal. App. (2d) 758 [52 Pac. (2d) 608] ; Hall v. Wolford, 22 Cal. App. (2d) 537 [71 Pac. (2d) 596].)
The motion is denied.
Griffin, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Hall v. Wolford Civ. 1856 · 1937-09-16
- Lisle v. Ragle Civ. 1754 · 1935-12-21
- North v. Evans Docket No. 875. · 1931-06-10
- Toth v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Docket No. 373. · 1931-03-27