gno.law

Scully v. Rosanoff

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 12741 · 1940-07-23 · Published · 40 Cal. App. 2d 249 · 104 P.2d 706 · 1940 Cal. App. LEXIS 98

FRANK SCULLY v. AARON J. ROSANOFF, Director of the Department of Institutions

Area
civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

The respondents having served and filed their motion to dismiss the appeal in the above-entitled matter, supported by a certificate of the clerk of the superior court setting forth the facts required by rule VI of this court, and it appearing that more than five months have elapsed since the filing of the notice of appeal, and it appearing that the notice of appeal was filed on the 29th day of December, 1939, and that no notice to prepare the clerk’s transcript has been filed, and that no transcript has been filed, It is hereby ordered that this appeal be, and it hereby is, dismissed.1.

Cited by