White v. White

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 12269 · 1940-03-25 · Published · 38 Cal. App. 2d 162 · 100 P.2d 791 · 1940 Cal. App. LEXIS 622

MARK B. WHITE v. ORRIN A. WHITE

Area: civil
Panel: Marshall F. McComb (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — McComb

McCOMB, J.

This is a motion for diminution of record by appellant to have the transcript on appeal changed by including certain testimony alleged to have been improperly omitted from the engrossed bill of exceptions and to have excluded from the engrossed bill of exceptions certain testimony included therein.

Appellant twice moved the trial court to correct the record in the same particulars as he now seeks to have this court correct the same. In each instance the trial court denied the motions.

Appellant has failed to establish to our satisfaction that the rulings of the trial court were incorrect. Therefore, section 652 of the Code of Civil Procedure is inapplicable and appellant’s motion for diminution of the record is denied.

Moore, P. J., and Wood, J., concurred.