Vitrano v. Westgate Sea Products Co.
JOSEPHINE VITRANO v. WESTGATE SEA PRODUCTS CO. (a Corporation)
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Charles R. Barnard (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Barnard
BARNARD, P. J.
The respondent has moved to dismiss this appeal upon the ground that no brief was filed by the appellants within the time provided for in the rules governing this court and that there was an unreasonable delay in this respect. After notice of the motion was filed but prior to the time set for making the motion, an opening brief was filed on behalf of the appellants. Similar circumstances have been held sufficient to justify the denial of such a motion. (Toth v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 113 Cal. App. 55 [297 Pac. 564] ; Graybiel v. Consolidated Assns., Ltd., 14 Cal. App. (2d) 547 [58 Pac. (2d) 665]; Hall v. Wolford, 22 Cal. App. (2d) 537 [71 Pac. (2d) 596].) While the delay here was longer than that in the cases cited we are inclined to apply the same rule in view of certain circumstances which here appear.
The motion to dismiss is denied.
Marks, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Hall v. Wolford Civ. 1856 · 1937-09-16
- Graybiel v. Consolidated Assns., Ltd. Civ. No. 1806 · 1936-06-11
- Toth v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Docket No. 373. · 1931-03-27
Cited by
- Crocker First National Bank v. Waite Civ. No. 11087 · 1939-06-12