Jacques v. Standard Oil Co.
C. W. JACQUES v. STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA (a Corporation)
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Warmer (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Warmer
WARMER, J., pro tem.
The questions presented on this appeal are 'identical with those presented in the ease of Pacific Indemnity Co., a Corporation, et al., v. California Electric Works, Ltd., a Corporation, et al., (ante, p. 260 [84 Pac. (2d) 313]), and were therein determined adversely to the appellants herein.
On the authority of that case the judgment is affirmed.
Barnard, P. J., and Marks, J., concurred.
A petition by appellants to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on January 12, 1939.
Cites, in this corpus
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. California Electric Works, Ltd. Civ. 2052 · 1938-11-16
Cited by
- Mayo v. Pacific Project Consultants, Inc. Civ. 9342 · 1969-11-20
- Abraham Lehr, Inc. v. Cortez Civ. 13699 · 1943-04-06
- Rehart v. Klossner Civ. 2792 · 1941-11-26
- Big Boy D. Corp., Ltd. v. Etheridge Civ. 12349 · 1941-04-09