gno.law

People v. Paluso

California Court of Appeal · Crim. No. 3117 · 1938-07-21 · Published · 27 Cal. App. 2d 769 · 81 P.2d 632 · 1938 Cal. App. LEXIS 746

THE PEOPLE v. EMIL PALUSO

Area
criminal
Panel
Wood (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Wood

WOOD, J.

In an information filed by the district attorney Emil Paluso, the defendant and appellant, was charged with violation of section 337a, subdivision 2, of the Penal Code in that on February 28, 1938, he unlawfully kept and occupied a room for the purpose of recording bets upon horse races. He was found guilty in a trial by the court and prosecutes this appeal from the judgment of conviction.

The evidence offered by the prosecution was similar to the evidence offered in.the case of People v. Paluso (People v. Allen), Crim. No. 3118 (ante, p. 642 [81 Pac. (2d) 630]), in which the opinion of the court is this day filed. The contentions of the appellant in this case are the same as the contentions made in the case to which reference has just been made.

For the reasons stated in People v. Paluso et al., supra, the judgment is affirmed.

Grail, P. J., and McComb, J., concurred.

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on August 18, 1938.

Cites, in this corpus