Cerezo v. Aztec Brewing Co.
MARGARET MAY CEREZO v. AZTEC BREWING COMPANY (a Corporation)
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Haines (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Haines
HAINES, J., pro tem.
This appeal involves the same state of facts involved in the companion case of Hubbert v. *755Aztec Brewing Co., this day decided (ante, p. 664 [80 Pac, (2d) 185]).
On the authority of that case the judgment is affirmed.
Barnard, P. J., and Marks, J., concurred.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on June 28, 1938, and an application by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on August 1, 1938.