Harvey & Johnston v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n
In the Matter of the Estate of IVAN B. HASELBUD, HARVEY & JOHNSTON v. BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION (a National Banking Association), as etc.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Haines (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Haines
HAINES, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by the law firm of Harvey & Johnston from so much of the order and decree of the Superior Court of Fresno County settling the final account of the executor in the above-entitled estate and making distribution of said estate as fixes the compensation allowed for extraordinary services of the attorneys for the executor at the sum of $250. Although the appeal was separately taken from the appeal of Anna N. Haselbud (ante, p. 375 [79 Pac. (2d) 443]), this day decided, from the same order and decree, it was presented upon the same transcript *385and has been assigned the same number. There is in the file, however, a communication from the said firm of Harvey & Johnston stating that they have stipulated with opposing counsel by a stipulation filed with the superior court that the said appeal of said Harvey & Johnston be dismissed.
The appeal is accordingly hereby dismissed.
Barnard, P. J., and Marks, J., concurred.