Isett v. Frees

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 11778 · 1938-03-23 · Published · 25 Cal. App. 2d 466 · 77 P.2d 873 · 1938 Cal. App. LEXIS 843

GEORGE W. ISETT v. BEN FREES

Area: civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

Upon submission of the motion to dismiss, the presiding justice in open court made the following statement:

This matter comes before the court on a motion to dismiss. The appellant has not appeared in the case; that is, there has been no transcript or brief filed within the time provided by law. The motion is good and it is granted. (In re Yahne, 193 Cal. 386 [224 Pac. 452]; In re Wignall, 193 Cal. 387 [224 Pac. 452].)

Cites, in this corpus

In Re Yahne Crim. No. 2656. · 1924-03-13
In Re Wignall Crim. No. 2653. · 1924-03-13

Cited by

Levin v. Levin Civ. No. 14443 · 1944-05-09
Green v. Ellis Civ. No. 12877 · 1940-12-30