Investment Building & Loan Ass'n v. Seely

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 11576 · 1937-12-08 · Published · 23 Cal. App. 2d 737 · 74 P.2d 82 · 1937 Cal. App. LEXIS 732

INVESTMENT BUILDING AND LOAN ASSN. v. HOWARD SEELY

Area: civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court. The clerk’s transcript was filed August 16, 1937. No briefs having been filed, appellant was regularly cited to show cause on December 8, 1937, why appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. In response to this order to show cause the appellant filed a typewritten answer in which he admits that the question involved on appeal has been decided against him, but contends in his said answer that it should not have been. No sufficient excuse is given for failure to file appellant’s opening brief, and therefore the order is made dismissing the appeal.

Appeal dismissed.