gno.law

Jameson v. Gavett

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 2022 · 1937-05-12 · Published · 21 Cal. App. 2d 10 · 67 P.2d 1072 · 1937 Cal. App. LEXIS 211

JAMES JAMESON, a Minor, etc. v. JACK GAVETT

Area
civil
Panel
Charles R. Barnard (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Barnard

BARNARD, P. J.

—The respondent moved to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground that the appellants had failed to file their printed points and authorities within thirty days after the filing of the transcript, as required by rule I, section 4, of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal.

The transcript was filed on February 26, 1937. The motion to dismiss the appeal was filed on April 20, 1937. On May 8, 1937, the appellants filed their printed brief. Under the circumstances here appearing the appeal should not be dismissed. (North v. Evans, 114 Cal. App. 714 [300 Pac. 893] ; Toth v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 113 Cal. App. 55 [297 Pac. 564] ; Tyner v. Axt, 111 Cal. App. 187 [295 Pac. 97] ; Fishman v. Silva, 108 Cal. App. 121 [291 Pac. 430]; Righetti v. Monroe, Lyon & Miller, Inc., 106 Cal. App. 346 [289 Pac. 650].)

The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.

Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus