gno.law

People v. Joseph

California Court of Appeal · Crim. No. 200 · 1937-02-15 · Published · 19 Cal. App. 2d 262 · 66 P.2d 675 · 1937 Cal. App. LEXIS 413

THE PEOPLE v. ARAM JOSEPH

Area
criminal
Panel
Charles R. Barnard (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Barnard

BARNARD, P. J.

The respondent -has moved to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the same has not been taken in accordance with law, in that no appeal lies from such an order.

The order from which the purported appeal is taken is not an appealable order. (Pen. Code, sec. 1237; People v. Hinshaw, 194 Cal. 1 [227 Pac. 156]; People v. Simmons, 119 Cal. 1 [50 Pac. 844]; People v. Izlar, 8 Cal. App. 600 [97 Pac. 685]; People v. Williams, 8 Cal. App. 595 [97 Pac. 684].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Marks, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus