In re Garrison
In the Matter of the Application of GEORGE R. ANDERSEN on Behalf of PETER GARRISON for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
- Area
- other
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
We have examined the ordinance for a violation of which petitioner claims he is being restrained of his liberty and in our opinion it is not unconstitutional upon the grounds urged in the petition.
The application is accordingly denied.
Cited by
- In Re Garrison Crim. No. 1944 · 1937-01-14