Olinger v. Pacific Greyhound Lines
ANNIE OLINGER v. PACIFIC GREYHOUND LINES (a Corporation)
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Marks (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Marks
MARKS, J.
This is a motion to dismiss the appeal under the provisions of rule Y of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal.
The certificate of the county clerk of San Diego County shows that judgment was entered on February 15, 1936; that motion for new trial was denied on April 18, 1936, and notice given on April 22, 1936; that notice of appeal was filed May 29, 1936; that no proceedings are pending for preparation of a transcript nor settlement of a bill of exceptions.
No transcript has been filed here and no appearance made by appellant.
The appeal is dismissed.
Barnard, P. J., and Jennings, J., concurred.
Cited by
- Olinger v. Pacific Greyhound Lines Civ. No. 2002 · 1936-12-10