People v. Lisenba

California Court of Appeal · Crim. No. 2894 · 1936-10-13 · Published · 17 Cal. App. 2d 42 · 61 P.2d 345 · 1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 521

THE PEOPLE v. MAJOR RAYMOND LISENBA

Area: criminal
Panel: Crail (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Crail

CRAIL, P. J.

This is an appeal from a conviction of incest, a felony. The clerk’s transcript was filed on June *4319, 1936. The reporter’s transcript was filed July 3, 1936, and the ease was ordered on the calendar for August 14, 1936, and due notice given. At the request of defendant the case has been continued six times, the last continuance being to October 9, 1936. The continuance to that date was at the request of the defendant and with full notice and knowledge on his part. At the hearing on that date the defendant did not appear. Neither has a brief been filed on behalf of appellant. Under authority of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Wood, J., and McComb, J., pro tem., concurred.

Cited by

People v. Lisenba Crim. No. 2894 · 1936-10-13