Marine v. Decker School District
HELEN MARINE v. DECKER SCHOOL DISTRICT
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Bishop (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Bishop
BISHOP, J., pro tem.
The notice of appeal, filed February 15, 1936, states that the plaintiffs appeal “from that *737certain order made and entered in the above entitled action on the 31st day of January, 1936, denying plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial”. The motion was made upon several of the grounds given as causes for a new trial in section 657 of the Code of Civil Procedure; reliance was not placed upon the provisions of section 953e of that code.
The order denying a motion for a new trial, so grounded, is not an appealable order. (Sec. 963, Code Civ. Proc.; 1 Cal. Jur. Ten-Year Supp. 296.)
The appeal is dismissed.
Houser, P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.