gno.law

Kurland v. Forest Lawn Memorial Park Ass'n

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 10909 · 1936-06-27 · Published · 15 Cal. App. 2d 762 · 59 P.2d 205 · 1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 141

SAMUEL L. KURLAND v. FOREST LAWN MEMORIAL PARK ASSOCIATION, INC.

Area
civil
Panel
Marshall F. McComb (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — McComb

McCOMB, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant after the trial court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend to plaintiff’s complaint, which alleged that defendant had libeled plaintiff.

On a similar set of facts we have this day decided in the case of Pollard v. Forest Lawn Memorial Park Association, Inc., Civil No. 10908 (ante, p. 77 [59 Pac. (2d) 203]) the identical questions of law involved in the instant case.

Therefore on the authority of Pollard v. Forest Lawn Memorial Park Association, Inc., supra, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Grail, P. J., and Wood, J., concurred.

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on August 24, 1936.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by