Potter v. City of Compton

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 10800 · 1936-07-07 · Published · 15 Cal. App. 2d 238 · 59 P.2d 540

THOMAS J. POTTER v. THE CITY OF COMPTON (a Municipal Corporation)

Area: civil
Panel: Clement L. Shinn (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Shinn

SHINN, J., pro tem.

Appellants challenge the jurisdiction of the trial court to grant relief from the default of respondent, resulting from his inadvertent failure to file his memorandum of costs within the statutory time after notice of entry of judgment. Upon authority of Soda v. Marriott, 130 Cal. App. 589 [20 Pac. (2d) 758], we hold that the court had jurisdiction to make the order appealed from, and it is therefore affirmed.

Houser, P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus

Soda v. Marriott Docket No. 4763. · 1933-03-24

Cited by

Spellens v. Spellens Docket Nos. L.A. 23683, 22553, 23135, 23180, 23685, 23717, 23684 · 1957-10-30
Lane v. Pacific Greyhound Lines S. F. 17446, 17447 · 1947-12-01