gno.law

Evans v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 11056 · 1936-06-24 · Published · 14 Cal. App. 2d 756 · 59 P.2d 160 · 1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 962

HUGH EVANS v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY

Area
civil
Panel
Marshall F. McComb (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — McComb

McCOMB, J., pro tem.

Petitioners seek a writ of mandate to compel respondent to dismiss a certain action entitled L. H. Booker, as Owner of Shares of Beneficial Interest in said Diversified Real Estate Investments Trust No. 2, an Unincorporated Trust, v. Hugh Evans & Co., a Corporation, et al., said action being No. 336381 in the files of respondent court.

On a similar set of facts we have this day decided in the case of Evans v. Superior Court, Second Civil No. 11055 (ante, p. 743 [59 Pac. (2d) 159]), the identical question of law involved in the instant case.

Therefore, on the authority of Evans v. Superior Court, supra, the petition is denied and the alternative writ is dismissed.

Grail, P. J., and Wood, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus