gno.law

Aaronson v. Aaronson

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 1801 · 1936-04-16 · Published · 13 Cal. App. 2d 273 · 56 P.2d 1271 · 1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 715

EFFIE ARLINE AARONSON v. P. V. AARONSON

Area
civil
Panel
Charles R. Barnard (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Barnard

BARNARD, P. J.

The respondent has moved to dismiss this appeal and has filed a certificate of the county clerk from which it appears that notice of appeal was filed on July 1, 1935; that no request for the preparation of a transcript has been filed; that no proposed bill of exceptions has been filed; that no additional time for the preparation of a record has been allowed; that no proceedings for the preparation of a record are pending in .the trial court; and that the time within which a record might be prepared under either method has expired. No appearance was made in opposition to the motion and the same should be granted. (Staffey v. Standard Stations, Inc., 131 Cal. App. 202 [20 Pac. (2d) 971].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus