Jordan v. Associated Discount Corp.
DAISY M. JORDAN v. ASSOCIATED DISCOUNT CORPORATION, LTD. (a Corporation), Defendants HAROLD FISCH
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
Mr. Justice Plummer on November 8, 1935, orally delivered the opinion of the court as follows:
This is an appeal from the Order of the Superior Court sustaining defendant, Harold Fiseh’s Motion to Strike and Demurrer to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, without leave to amend. No appeal lies from such Order. (Sec. 963, Code Civ. Proc.; Braren v. Reliable Carpet Works, Inc., 125 Cal. App. 489 [13 Pac. (2d) 972], and cases cited.) Appeal dismissed.
Cites, in this corpus
- Braren v. Reliable Carpet Works, Inc. Docket No. 8305. · 1932-08-25
Cited by
- Jordan v. Associated Discount Corp. Civ. No. 5445 · 1935-11-08