Standard Pipe & Supply Co. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 10489 · 1935-11-01 · Published · 9 Cal. App. 2d 769 · 51 P.2d 910 · 1935 Cal. App. LEXIS 1232

STANDARD PIPE AND SUPPLY COMPANY (a Corporation) v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY

Area: civil
Panel: Douglas L. Edmonds (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Edmonds

EDMONDS, J., pro tem.

Petitioner in this matter is in exactly the same situation as the petitioner in Oil Well Supply Co. v. Superior Court (ante, p. 624 [51 Pac. (2d) 908]), this day decided. As a creditor of Wigle & McBride and a beneficiary under the declaration of trust there referred to its rights to the trust property are also about to be determined by the superior court by an order to be made upon the report and account of the trustee.

Eor the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the other proceeding it is ordered that the respondent superior court be and it is hereby prohibited from making or entering any judgment, order or decree in the Matter of Trusteeship of Wigle & McBride, Inc., a Corporation, No. 298-436 in said court.

Let a peremptory writ of prohibition issue accordingly.

York, Acting P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus

Oil Well Supply Co. v. Superior Court Civ. 10483 · 1935-11-01