People v. Kerr
THE PEOPLE v. MILO C. KERR
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Jess E. Stephens (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Stephens
STEPHENS, P. J.
Motion to dismiss appeal on the ground that the transcript contains no statement of the grounds of appeal or the points upon which appellant relies, as required by section 7, rule II, of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal of the state of California.
The point for decision herein is practically the same as in People v. Gonzales, ante, p. 164 [47 Pac. (2d) 314], this day decided, and our ruling follows our expressions therein made.
The appeal is dismissed.
Grail, J., concurred.
A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on July 25,1935.
Langdon, J., voted for a hearing.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Gonzales Crim. 2550 · 1935-06-28